(dissenting).

In my view the evidence of defendant’s prior criminal acts did not satisfy any of the criteria contained in subsection 90.404(2), Florida Statutes (1989), and was consequently inadmissible. See C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence §§ 404.10, 404.12, 404.13, 404.14, 404.16 (1992); M. Graham, Handbook of Florida Evidence § 404.2 (1987). I would reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.

Affirmed. Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925 (Fla. 1990); Green v. State, 427 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 438 So.2d 834 (Fla. 1983); Heuring v. State, 513 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1987).

BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.