Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Pelella v. Pelella

Pelella v. Pelella
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 11, 1992 · No. 91-2931 · Goderich, Jorgenson, Nesbitt
604 So. 2d 14; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9077; 1992 WL 191608 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Pelella v. Pelella

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child. See Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hess v. Hess, 466 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1985); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.