Robertson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Robertson v. State, 605 So. 2d 94 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8043; 1992 WL 161657
Alderman, James, Letts, Owen, William
Robertson v. State
Opinion of the Court
Reversed on the authority of Kelly v. State, 593 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and Grissett v. State, 594 So.2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Upon remand the trial court shall enter an order of discharge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially:
We concur because of the above precedents, cases which we feel were wrongly decided.
070rehearing
ON REHEARING
ORDERED that appellee’s motion filed July 30, 1992, for rehearing en banc is hereby denied; further,
ORDERED that appellee’s motion filed July 30, 1992, for certification of question is granted. The following question is hereby certified to the Supreme Court of Florida:
DOES THE SOURCE OF ILLEGAL DRUGS USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL TO CONDUCT REVERSE STINGS CONSTITUTIONALLY SHIELD THOSE WHO BECOME ILLICITLY INVOLVED WITH SUCH DRUGS FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY?
ORDERED that appellee’s motion filed July 30, 1992, to stay mandate pending Supreme Court review is hereby granted.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John Francis ROBERTSON v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published