Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith
Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith
605 So. 2d 167; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9863; 1992 WL 222004
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
The trial judge’s findings of fact in a nonjury trial will not be disturbed where they are supported by competent and substantial evidence even if that evidence is disputed. Antun Invests. Corp. v. Ergas, 549 So.2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ren-Del Enters., Inc. v. Florida Keys First State Bank, 539 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Competent and substantial evidence was presented that the appellant breached the roof repair contract and, for that reason, was not entitled to a judgment of foreclosure on its mechanic’s lien.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.