Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Schaad v. Frisk Corp., N.V.

Schaad v. Frisk Corp., N.V.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 20, 1992 · Goderich, Jorgenson, Levy
605 So. 2d 1027; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11066; 1992 WL 296040 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Schaad v. Frisk Corp., N.V.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There was competent substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and reinstate the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. See Stirling v. Sapp, 229 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1969); United Farm Agency of Fla., Inc. v. DKLS, Inc., 560 So.2d 1212 (Fla.3d DCA 1990).

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑