Gray v. State
Gray v. State
605 So. 2d 1027; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11079; 1992 WL 296041
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gray v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in not permitting the defense to peremptorily challenge prospective juror Martinez or in allowing the State to use a peremptory challenge to exclude prospective juror Minnis. See State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18, 22 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219, 108 S.Ct. 2873, 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984), clarified sub nom. State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla. 1986). Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s conviction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.