Suggs v. State
Suggs v. State
606 So. 2d 506; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11210; 1992 WL 308632
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Suggs v. State
Opinion of the Court
Since condition (11) of the order which placed appellant on probation was not orally pronounced at sentencing, we strike that condition from the probation order. See Shaddix v. State, 599 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Vincent v. State, 600 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Otherwise, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.