Floridstone, N.V. v. Fitzpatrick
Floridstone, N.V. v. Fitzpatrick
606 So. 2d 513; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276; 1992 WL 310342
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Floridstone, N.V. v. Fitzpatrick
Opinion of the Court
We reject Floridstone’s position that the settlement is voidable because it did not receive sufficient notice of the hearing where the trial court originally approved the settlement distributions. See § 733.-610, Fla.Stat. (1991). Floridstone was present at the properly noticed hearing on the Personal Representative’s Petition for Discharge, wherein the court expressly approved the settlement. Floridstone failed to present evidence at that hearing to show that the transaction should be voided.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.