Matos v. State
Matos v. State
606 So. 2d 1289; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11960; 1992 WL 332660
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Matos v. State
Opinion of the Court
We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the state failed to prove at trial that she embezzled in excess of $20,000 of her employer’s funds. As to the sentence, however, the state acknowledges the combined sentence of community control and probation exceeds the statutory maximum. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence and remand for correction.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.