Oropesa v. State
Oropesa v. State
606 So. 2d 1289; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11441; 1992 WL 332637
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Oropesa v. State
Opinion of the Court
Finding a valid departure reason supported by the record, Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1986), Rey v. State, 509 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written sentence to comport with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing that the terms be served concurrently. Perez v. State, 498 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.