Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Oropesa v. State

Oropesa v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 13, 1992 · Danahy, Frank, Schoonover
606 So. 2d 1289; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11441; 1992 WL 332637 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Oropesa v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Finding a valid departure reason supported by the record, Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1986), Rey v. State, 509 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written sentence to comport with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing that the terms be served concurrently. Perez v. State, 498 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.