Sabal v. State
Sabal v. State
608 So. 2d 119; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11472; 1992 WL 316381
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Sabal v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence finding there was sufficient evidence presented by the state inconsistent with appellant’s hypothesis of innocence to overcome the motion for judgment of acquittal. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1989). We consider Grover v. State, 581 So.2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), factually distinguishable. We find no error in the remaining points on appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.