Fox v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Fox v. State, 608 So. 2d 132 (1992)
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11856; 1992 WL 324887
Barkdull, Hubbart, Schwartz
Fox v. State
Opinion of the Court
Because the appellant’s sole point on the merits presents only harmless error, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986), the convictions under review are affirmed. The cause is remanded for resentencing within the appropriate cell without including legal constraint points under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d. 6. The fact that the defendant was on felony bond when the offenses were committed does not permit such an assessment. Brown v. State, 569 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 1990); Mosely v. State, 543 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Mize v. State, 495 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Charles Nathan FOX v. The STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published