Cinnante v. State
Cinnante v. State
608 So. 2d 550; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029; 1992 WL 336109
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cinnante v. State
Opinion of the Court
We agree with appellant that, contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830, the judgment of contempt does not include “a recital of those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt,” is based. Although a technical error, it requires a reversal and remand for correction of the judgment. Woods v. State, 600 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.