Creamer v. Crane
Creamer v. Crane
609 So. 2d 162; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12711; 1992 WL 361322
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Creamer v. Crane
Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded for an evidentia-ry hearing on the authority of Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 425 So.2d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 433 So.2d 519 (Fla. 1983).
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially.
Because I see no basis alleged in the record for compelling the appellants, who were not parties to the contract in dispute, to arbitrate their disputes with the appel-lees, I would reverse and remand with directions that the motion to compel arbitration be denied as to appellants. See Federated Title Insurers, Inc. v. Ward, 538 So.2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.