Hargrove v. State
Hargrove v. State
609 So. 2d 177; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12588; 1992 WL 372251
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hargrove v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm Belton Hargrove’s judgment and sentence. We remand for correction of the written judgment.
As to count one of the information, the trial court orally adjudicated Hargrove guilty of possession of methamphetamine, a third-degree felony, which was consistent with the jury verdict. However, the written judgment reflects that Hargrove was adjudicated guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to sell, a second-degree felony. Although the parties did not raise this issue, we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Maynard v. State, 525 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.