Regas v. Regas
Regas v. Regas
Opinion of the Court
We are unable to determine from the record whether appellee’s first wife received the $4,000 allegedly paid by appellant/second ex-wife as garnishee into the registry of the court. The documents tendered to the master were not authenticated nor do they answer the question of receipt or nonreceipt by the first wife. The trial judge took no testimony on the exception to the master’s report. Assuming such receipt took place, appellant would be entitled to relief.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.