Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

State v. Haynes

State v. Haynes
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 30, 1992 · Ervin, Wigginton, Zehmer
610 So. 2d 114; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13346; 1992 WL 385369 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Haynes

Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The state purports to bring this appeal from the imposition of an habitual felon sentence on the basis that the sentence is illegal. We disagree and grant Haynes’ motion to dismiss the appeal. While the state is entitled to appeal or cross appeal an illegal sentence pursuant to section 924.-07(l)(e), Florida Statutes, the instant sentence is not illegal. Cf. State v. Hohl, 431 So.2d 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the state’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Turning to Haynes’ cross appeal, we hold that although it was error for the trial court to give the jury an instruction on flight,1 the error was harmless beyond any *115reasonable doubt. Accordingly, Haynes’ judgment of conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

. See Fenelon v. State, 594 So.2d 292 (Fla. 1992); Keys v. State, 606 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.