Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Bayliff v. State

Bayliff v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 30, 1992 · Anstead, Farmer, Letts
610 So. 2d 731; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13749; 1992 WL 385459 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bayliff v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this case the jury found defendant guilty of all charges except Count III, depriving an officer of his means of protection. At sentencing, the trial court nevertheless imposed a concurrent sentence for this offense. The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in so doing.

We reverse the sentence and remand, therefore, with instructions to correct this obvious oversight. We affirm on all other issues.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.