Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

State v. Howell

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 10, 1992 · No. 91-1677 · Miner, Smith, Wigginton

611 So. 2d 5; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12503; 1992 WL 362208 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Schank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The state challenges a downward departure sentence that was imposed without regard to the requirements of Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 1990). Specifically, the trial court failed to issue contemporaneous written reasons when it sentenced appellee to community control and a term of probation; appellee’s guidelines scoresheet recommended 7 to 9 years in prison.1 We agree that the trial court’s delay necessitates a remand for resentencing with no possibility of departure from the guidelines. See Fraser v. State, 602 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 1992); Owens v. State, 598 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1992); Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990). However, appellee’s sentence must not exceed the statutory maximum. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)10. On remand, we alert the trial court to Fraser, supra, which allows credit for time served on community control.

The challenged sentence is vacated, and the cause remanded for resentencing.

SMITH, WIGGINTON and MINER, JJ., concur.

. At sentencing, the state only sought a five year sentence, which represented the statutory maximum for appellee's third-degree felony (attempted lewd assault on a child).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.