Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1992

Cato v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 22, 1992 · Allen, Smith, Wolf

611 So. 2d 22; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13581; 1992 WL 382642 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Moffett v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges his habitual offender sentence, arguing that the court erred in failing to make the requisite findings under section 775.084, Florida Statutes. Because the appellant’s counsel acknowledged at the sentencing hearing that the appellant qualified for a habitual offender sentence, the necessity of specific findings under the statute was waived. See Robinson v. State, 605 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The challenged sentence is therefore affirmed.

SMITH, ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.