Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

City of Melbourne v. Puma

City of Melbourne v. Puma
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 9, 1993 · Per Curiam
616 So. 2d 190; 1993 WL 104644 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

City of Melbourne v. Puma

Opinion

616 So.2d 190 (1993)

CITY OF MELBOURNE, Appellant,
v.
Joseph Albert PUMA, Appellee.

No. 92-1038.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 9, 1993.

Paul R. Gougelman, III and Michael R. Riemenschneider of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, for appellant.

Ralph Geilich, Melbourne, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Snyder v. Board of County Commissioners, 595 So.2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), juris. accepted, 605 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1992). See also ABG Real Estate Development Company of Florida, Inc. v. St. Johns County, 608 So.2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑