Ingram Enterprises v. Langston
Ingram Enterprises v. Langston
611 So. 2d 115; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334; 1993 WL 9001
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ingram Enterprises v. Langston
Opinion of the Court
Appellants seek a remand in this workers’ compensation appeal, showing that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. In these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.