Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Pacheco v. State

Pacheco v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 2, 1993 · Gersten, Levy, Nesbitt
613 So. 2d 617; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2699; 1993 WL 52988 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pacheco v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant, Pacheco, is procedurally barred from raising a new claim in his second rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief since he has failed to demonstrate why he was unable to raise this claim in his first rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Bertolotti v. State, 565 So.2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 1990); Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22, 24 (Fla. 1986).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.