Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Smith v. State

Smith v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 2, 1993 · Barfield, Ervin, Smith
613 So. 2d 617; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372; 1993 WL 53124 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Smith v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction is affirmed because it appears that appellant was aware of the risks involved in rejecting the plea offer prior to the prosecutor withdrawing that offer. See Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 98 S.Ct. 663, 54 L.Ed.2d 604 (1978). Appellant’s habitual violent felony offender sentence is affirmed under the authority of Ross v. State, 601 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 1992); Tillman v. State, 609 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 1992); Becker v. State, 612 So.2d 559 (Fla. 1992); Reeves v. State, 612 So.2d 560 (Fla. 1992).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑