A.D.M. v. State
A.D.M. v. State
614 So. 2d 691; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3089; 1993 WL 66314
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
A.D.M. v. State
Opinion of the Court
The State concedes that A.D.M.’s placement in secure detention as a punishment for contempt was improper pursuant to A.A. v. Rolle, 604 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1992). Accordingly, we vacate the order of detention and remand for proceedings consistent with Rolle.
REVERSED and CAUSE REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.