AFFIRMED. We agree with appellee that there was substantial competent evidence presented to the trial court to support its conclusion that the proceeds of the sale of appellants’ homestead property were not intended by the appellants to be reinvested in another homestead as contemplated by the law set out in Orange Brevard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. La Croix, 137 So.2d 201 (Fla. 1962).