Wall v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Wall v. State, 615 So. 2d 822 (1993)
1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3269; 1993 WL 74260
Farmer, James, Stone, Walden
Wall v. State
Opinion of the Court
The State concedes that Appellant s right to confront witnesses was violated by the introduction of a deposition to perpetuate testimony at which Appellant was not present. Brown v. State, 471 So.2d 6 (Fla. 1985). Its use constitutes fundamental error. Regarding the other issue raised, we find no error in the denial of Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John WALL, Appellant/cross-appellee v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/cross-appellant
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published