Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Petit-Homme v. State

Petit-Homme v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 28, 1993 · Glickstein, Gunther, James, Walden
616 So. 2d 642; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736; 1993 WL 130961 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Petit-Homme v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. See Johnson v. State, 438 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1051, 104 S.Ct. 1329, 79 L.Ed.2d 724 (1984). However, we remand for resentencing to determine the appropriate credit for time spent in jail. The trial court informed appellant that he was entitled to such credit, and the only issue to be decided on remand is the actual number of days. See Brown v. State, 584 So.2d 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.