Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Moment v. State

Moment v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 28, 1993 · Joanos, Webster, Zehmer
616 So. 2d 644; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4749; 1993 WL 132619 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Moment v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, C.J., and WEBSTER, J., concur. ZEHMER, J., concurs with written opinion.

Concurring Opinion

ZEHMER, Judge

(concurring).

I concur in affirming the appealed judgment of conviction, not because the prose-cutorial conduct complained of by appellant did not constitute error, but because these errors were not properly preserved for appellate review due to the complete absence of objection as to two of the errors, and the insufficiency of the objection in respect to the third error. Our affirmance in this case should not be taken as approval of such conduct.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.