Cruz v. State
Cruz v. State
617 So. 2d 454; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305; 1993 WL 139766
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cruz v. State
Opinion of the Court
We vacate defendants’ sentences because the court imposed sentences in excess of the statutory maximum for second degree misdemeanors. Shaktman v. State, 529 So.2d 711, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 553 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1989); § 775.-082(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).
Defendants’ remaining point lacks merit. William v. State, 591 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Flanagan v. State, 536 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.