Defendant appeals an order of restitution entered after pleading nolo contendere to theft. The state concedes that the order requiring restitution of $5,033 should be reduced by $860. We also conclude it should be further reduced by $85 because the evidence does not support that amount being included in what defendant was ordered to pay. We therefore remand with instructions that the order of restitution be reduced to $4,088.

Reversed.