Dunning v. Peregoy

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Dunning v. Peregoy, 617 So. 2d 1091 (1993)
1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4029; 1993 WL 95503
Cobb, Dauksch, Diamantis

Dunning v. Peregoy

Dissenting Opinion

DIAMANTIS, Judge,

dissenting.

I dissent from the dismissal of this appeal. I would treat the appeal, under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c), as a petition for certiorari and address the merits as the court did in the case of Tucker v. Resha, 610 So.2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA1992), which also involved a denial by the trial court of a motion for summary judgment based upon a claim of qualified immunity to a civil rights action filed pursuant to Title 42, section 1983.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur. DIAMANTIS, J., dissents with opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Roy DUNNING, in his Individual Capacity v. Robert PEREGOY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published