Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Dunning v. Peregoy

Dunning v. Peregoy
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 2, 1993 · Cobb, Dauksch, Diamantis
617 So. 2d 1091; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4029; 1993 WL 95503 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dunning v. Peregoy

Dissenting Opinion

DIAMANTIS, Judge,

dissenting.

I dissent from the dismissal of this appeal. I would treat the appeal, under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c), as a petition for certiorari and address the merits as the court did in the case of Tucker v. Resha, 610 So.2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA1992), which also involved a denial by the trial court of a motion for summary judgment based upon a claim of qualified immunity to a civil rights action filed pursuant to Title 42, section 1983.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur. DIAMANTIS, J., dissents with opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.