Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Wolpowitz v. Wolpowitz

Wolpowitz v. Wolpowitz
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 19, 1993 · Anstead, Farmer, Gunther
618 So. 2d 365; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625; 1993 WL 164844 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wolpowitz v. Wolpowitz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. FARMER, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

FARMER, Judge,

concurring specially.

Our action, in affirming the trial court’s decision to deny temporary attorney’s fees under section 61.16, Florida Statutes (1991), in this dissolution of marriage action should not be understood by the trial judge as the law of the case as to either the reasonableness of the fee agreement between the Wife and her lawyer or the reasonableness of the fees he has charged her to date. Both of these subjects remain open for consideration in any future application for fees. In denying fees, the trial judge has not necessarily ruled on these issues.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.