Scalf v. Singletary
Scalf v. Singletary
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus or alternative writ of mandamus, without prejudice to appellant to re-submit his grievance appeal to the Secretary, Department of Corrections, attaching a copy of his formal grievance and response in compliance with Rule 33-29.2007, Florida Administrative Code.
070rehearing
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION
We grant appellant’s motion for clarification of a rule citation that was printed inadvertently in error and correct our opinion (Fla. 1st DCA May 21, 1993), to substitute Rule 33-29.007 for Rule 33-29.2007, Florida Administrative Code.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.
MINER, MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Associate Judge, concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.