Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Scalf v. Singletary

Scalf v. Singletary
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 21, 1993 · Alan, Mickle, Miner, Schwartz
618 So. 2d 368; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5990; 1993 WL 169162 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Scalf v. Singletary

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus or alternative writ of mandamus, without prejudice to appellant to re-submit his grievance appeal to the Secretary, Department of Corrections, attaching a copy of his formal grievance and response in compliance with Rule 33-29.2007, Florida Administrative Code.

MINER, MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

070rehearing

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for clarification of a rule citation that was printed inadvertently in error and correct our opinion (Fla. 1st DCA May 21, 1993), to substitute Rule 33-29.007 for Rule 33-29.2007, Florida Administrative Code.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

MINER, MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.