Byrnes v. State
Byrnes v. State
619 So. 2d 522; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6702; 1993 WL 215591
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Byrnes v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant petitioned the circuit court for a writ of mandamus, arguing that he was improperly denied restoration of forfeited gain time. Appellant failed to demonstrate he had exhausted available administrative remedies, and we therefore affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a new petition correcting these deficiencies. See Tunstall v. Folsom, 616 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.