Murphy v. State
Murphy v. State
620 So. 2d 248; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715; 1993 WL 216851
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Murphy v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting in part.
Appellant was adjudicated and sentenced as a habitual offender. One of the issues he raises is a claim that the state failed to prove that he was the same John Murphy whose name appeared on the prior convictions used by the court to qualify him as a habitual offender. Because the state failed to adduce proof on that issue I would reverse the habitual offender order.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.