Crockett v. State
Crockett v. State
620 So. 2d 1306; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7623; 1993 WL 267379
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Crockett v. State
Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded for a new trial. We agree with appellant that the trial court failed to make a sufficient inquiry concerning the apparent conflict of interest of appellant’s counsel in his representation of appellant as well as a prosecution witness. See DeArce v. State, 405 So.2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA1981).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.