Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Riddell v. Jacobson & Cohen, P.A.

Riddell v. Jacobson & Cohen, P.A.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 4, 1993 · Anstead, Owen, Stone, William
622 So. 2d 140; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8075; 1993 WL 289294 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Riddell v. Jacobson & Cohen, P.A.

Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

STONE, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

I agree with the majority to deny rehearing and I write separately only to note that the underlying discovery order compels production of the files and materials in the lawyer’s possession pertaining to the original claim out of which this malpractice action arose. There is nothing in the request to produce or order compelling production that would require the disclosure of communications or material prepared on the legal malpractice claim.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.