Bruce v. State
Bruce v. State
622 So. 2d 638; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8897; 1993 WL 324037
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bruce v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant argues that the court erred when it revoked his probation. Although our review leads us to conclude that the record contains sufficient evidence to find that appellant violated his probation, we remand for the trial court to properly specify which conditions were violated in a written order of revocation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.