Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Brown v. State

Brown v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 17, 1993 · Diamantis, Griffin, Harris
623 So. 2d 867; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9432; 1993 WL 355193 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Brown v. State

Opinion of the Court

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Anthony Brown challenges the legality of his sentence, claiming that the trial court erred in computing his sentencing guidelines scoresheet because the court utilized a multiplier in assessing legal constraint points. See Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991). We conclude that this matter must be remanded to the trial court for a hearing because the instant record does not contain the pertinent documents concerning the sentence which was imposed following an earlier reversal by this court. Brown v. State, 581 So.2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

VACATED; REMANDED for a hearing.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑