Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Dorez Electronics Corp. v. Fleet Credit Leasing Corp.

Dorez Electronics Corp. v. Fleet Credit Leasing Corp.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 5, 1993 · Baskin, Cope, Hubbart
623 So. 2d 1254; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9972; 1993 WL 390370 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dorez Electronics Corp. v. Fleet Credit Leasing Corp.

Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellees correctly concede that the trial court erred in granting final summary judgment against defendants. “A summary judgment should not be granted unless the facts are so crystallized that nothing remains but *1255questions of law.” Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666, 668 (Fla. 1985). “If the existence of such issues or the possibility of their existence is reflected in the record, or the record raises even the slightest [reasonable] doubt in this respect, the judgment must be reversed.” Briadi Trading Co. v. Anthony R. Abraham Trading Enter., Inc., 469 So.2d 955, 956 (Fla. 3d DCA1985). The record in this case demonstrates that issues of fact exist. Thus, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.