Crittenden v. State
Crittenden v. State
624 So. 2d 411; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9928; 1993 WL 383469
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Crittenden v. State
Opinion of the Court
We find no error in the scoring of victim injury twice on appellant’s sentencing guidelines scoresheet. However, we agree, and the state has conceded, that since the written judgment and sentence is at variance with the court’s oral pronouncement of sentence, this cause must be remanded for correction of the written sentence so as to correspond to the court’s oral pronouncement.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for correction of written sentence.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.