Farmer v. State
Farmer v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant was convicted of unlawful purchase of contraband after a nolo conten-dere plea preserving her right to appeal a denial of her previously filed motion to suppress. We find no error in the denial of the motion to suppress, State v. Evans, 620 So.2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA1993); Minnis v. State, 577 So.2d 973 (Fla. 4th DCA1991); State v. Abiri, 539 So.2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA1989); Bussey v. State, 528 So.2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA1988); State v. Ruiz, .526 So.2d 170 (Fla. 3d DCA1988); State v. Lewis, 518 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA1988); State v. Hetland, 366 So.2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA1979); State v. Williams, 358 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA1978); State v. Mullin, 286 So.2d 36
Affirmed as modified.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.