There was no error in the trial court’s determination that its previous award of attorney’s fees in this matrimonial action was based on the wife’s needs and was therefore a debt in the nature of support which was not discharged by the husband’s bankruptcy. In *1247re Spong, 661 F.2d 6 (2d Cir. 1981); In re Friedland, 18 B.R. 451, 453 (S.D.Fla. 1982); Matter of Vazquez, 92 B.R. 533, 535 (S.D.Fla. 1988); cf. Scharmen v. Scharmen, 613 So.2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Affirmed.