Austin v. State
Austin v. State
625 So. 2d 1316; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11101; 1993 WL 444893
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Austin v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm, except that it is impermissible to impose consecutive mandatory minimum terms on a violent habitual felony offender where the offenses arose from the same criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla. 1992). Further, the state concedes error. We reverse this aspect and remand for resentencing to correct the error.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.