Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Daniel v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Daniel v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 6, 1993 · Anstead, Arthur, Birken, Glickstein
626 So. 2d 258; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9987; 1993 WL 390424 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Daniel v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, J., and BIRKEN, ARTHUR M., Associate Judge, concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

I would reverse the summary final judgment and remand for a trial on the merits so that the trial court could fully assess the facts to determine if there is an equitable basis for concluding that the appellant is the father of appellee-mother’s deceased child by the doctrine of equitable adoption, or if she is estopped to deny that he is the father.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.