Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Bolufe v. Ramirez

Bolufe v. Ramirez
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 2, 1993 · Barkdull, Ferguson, Schwartz
626 So. 2d 286; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11120; 1993 WL 442476 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bolufe v. Ramirez

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court properly granted a new trial because of the golden rule arguments made by defense counsel below. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1959); Miku v. Olmen, 193 So.2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. denied, 201 So.2d 232 (Fla. 1967).

There is no merit in the point raised on cross appeal. See § 627.7262, Fla.Stat. (1991) (renumbered § 627.4136, Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1992)),

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.