Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Lund v. State

Lund v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 16, 1993 · Goderich, Nesbitt, Schwartz
626 So. 2d 324; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11562; 1993 WL 469341 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Lund v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, the sentences imposed by the trial court on Counts II, III, and V are improper since the sentences exceed the statutory maximum. See §§ 914.22(1), 843.02, 775.082(3)(d), 775.082(4), Florida Statutes (1989). The remaining points raised by the defendant lack merit. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s sentences as to Counts II, III, and V, and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.