Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Rozier v. State

Rozier v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 19, 1993 · Goshorn, Griffin, Peterson
626 So. 2d 342; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11650; 1993 WL 473154 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rozier v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the restitution ordered for expenses to cover the cost of the victim’s inpatient treatment. The restitution ordered for the travel expenses and lost wages of the mother of the victim are stricken, however. See Watson v. State, 579 So.2d 900 (Fla. 4th DCA1991); Cliburn v. State, 510 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA1987). We also strike the “state attorney’s fee.” E.g., Turkaly v. State, 615 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA1993).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GOSHORN, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑