Seitz v. State
Seitz v. State
626 So. 2d 1124; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12013; 1993 WL 495985
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Seitz v. State
Opinion of the Court
We have considered the issues raised by appellant, Gerald D. Seitz, and we find them to be without merit. We, thus, affirm his convictions and sentences. However, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same issue which we certified in Jones v. State, 619 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), review granted, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1993); namely, whether the constitutional right to privacy renders unconstitutional that portion of section 800.-04, Florida Statutes which provides that consent is not a defense to a prosecution for sexual activity with a minor under age sixteen.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.